The purpose of this school is not that you should go out and kick the crap out of it using a ruler technique against you. I do not believe that this is the way to go. Instead, I show how you can neutralize the sender's words. In other words, to be politically correct pain in the ass.
I have previously written about the invisibility and ridicule. After this post follows the double punishment, imposition of guilt and shame, objectification and violence or threats of violence. Withholding information.
One way is that others have a pre-meeting danmark väder that you are not called for. So is he always in politics between the rulers and the non-steer. danmark väder Those in power are going through all the points and come to a decision that is forced through under the official decision-making meeting, such as the city council.
Or you have the right to be at the meeting but who convenes forget keying down your email address in the to field. If anyone else in the place asking where is the pressure on the shoulders and spoken word art international organizations like: "I danmark väder do not know, I have not heard."
Another way is to make sure that you do not receive specific mailings. Or let you meet with a tome of paper in place that contains new information on a case, you are expected danmark väder to make decisions about the current meeting.
It may also be that some of the others had lunch together and then discuss the issue. Or trained together at the gym last night. Or sat and talked on the AW they were on without you last week. They might even come up with a common position on this issue. Note that, however, is all it is - an opinion. danmark väder For the decision taken at the meeting in which you are participating.
"Now it seems that you have already discussed danmark väder this matter between you prior to this meeting. I was not then so can not you begin by updating danmark väder (of us) about how the discussion has gone? "
Option 1: "No, we have not talked about this before." "Then I seem to have misunderstood. You spoke as if a decision has already been made which I responded. Right. Who wants to start? "
Option 2: (discomfort in the room. For they had a meeting before and they know that it was perfectly ok.) "Well, meeting and meeting, we ran into each other in the hallway / it came up over lunch / X, and then came we concluded that ... "
"Ok, how did the argument then? I understand that you can not repeat danmark väder word for word but draw the great mind moves (for the rest of us) that I (we) have the same information that you have before making a decision on the question please. "
"Now it seems to be that the rest of you have received information not found up to me. Since I have not had time to review this information at your leisure, we simply shelve the issue. "
Take it for granted that there has been a mistake and that it is a given that no one is expected to speak up about something they've never seen or make unfounded decision. If it is not obvious to the other is the mode that you are on you.
"I understand that we need to come to a decision on this issue but we do not serve to make quick unfounded decisions when more information is available. On the contrary, increases the risk that we are going wrong. Of course you also want to get all the information so you can stay updated on the field before taking responsibility for a decision? "
Maybe you are met by reduction of the role of information, "But (your name), this is not such a big difference to what we already knew. We note that you are not completely before inserting the new data, making the decision and move on. "Maybe thrown a tome of paper over to you as a hen expects you to scan and then accept.
Lifting a finger in the air to show that you own the conversation space right now. Scroll simultaneously in the papers and try to create an overview. If you feel you can not, repeat the need for plating.
"It may well be as you say, that there is much that is different, but I can not create my own opinion about it right now. We'll just shelve danmark väder this issue, nothing strange about it, and hope that all the information to come find their way so we do not defer more decisions. "With clear, firm voice. (Work out at home in the bathroom in front of the mirror if it is not natural to you.) And watch each one at the meeting of the eyes. Imagine that you are Mount Blanc: large, hard, cold. And unwavering. You show that you do not accept to not be fully up to date and that you will oppose your decision every time this happens. Take the problem Initiative.
Say you are instead greeted by a tome of paper on the table when you sit down. (It's happened to me.) It is not only you who have not received all the information, it has basically no different either. Loose in the same manner as above. Want to stay fairly neutral, it is about describing mischief to keep the information
No comments:
Post a Comment