Article author's additions | Pär's blog
Regarding azevias de grao my criticism of feminism on Brännpunkt today: In an article you have to make themselves short. azevias de grao Here on the blog, I develop the idea a little more. Incidentally, the book "Man's Oppression and female domination" can be ordered (150 SEK) or downloaded for free (pdf or mp3) here.
Consider this statement: "According to the traditional gender role pattern, it is women who must stay home with the children, while the men have access to the workplace." Is there anything strange about the claim? Yes, it contains azevias de grao two loaded terms, the negatively charged "must" and the positively charged "have access to". These are interspersed with the statement that men appear to be favored, and women appear to be underutilized.
Taste this alternative formulation: "The traditional gender role pattern, it is women who have access azevias de grao to the children, while the men have to enter working azevias de grao life." Suddenly it is sorry for the men as they are being exploited by the women. Why can not you just as easily see it like?
Because feminism has created a score that favors the self. In fact, women have a great privilege in its traditional position closest to the kids, but it pretends to not care. It is one of many examples of how feminism angled social climate. Many of the women's privilege "does not count".
Feminism also applies the "equality a la carte". It wants to change things in the areas where women are, or considered to be, at a disadvantage. In areas where the men are at a disadvantage however, it might well continue to be as it is. Now maybe conscription will be abolished, but why feminism has for decades been so incredibly quiet about the huge injustice that military service meant for men? And why is it all right for a woman to say to her husband: "Olle, how long will I have to nag at you, when you should clean the drain in the basement?" While it would be horrible and totally unthinkable for a man to say to his wife "Eve, how long will I have to nag at you, when you should wash up after yesterday '?
Another thing I want to address in this extension of Focal Point article is the role of media. Some brilliant exceptions, but in essence, the media have gone into the role of megaphone for feminism. "There is a very, very big fear among leading media companies to go against the feminist currents, and the same goes for the press corps. We have received a subjective journalism in the area. Media has a huge debt for the perverse social climate, "said freelance journalist Annica Frisk. This has led many media in their news reporting actively seek out news that can be presented as different forms of oppression of women, while the positions of the men is not nearly as interesting. This has in turn led to the Swedish people today have an exaggerated view of women's problems and an over exaggerated picture of men's problems. Excellent soil for feminism, then, which of course was the point.
Furthermore, we have received an incorrect definition of the concept of equality. The original, and rightly so, the meaning is that no one should be inhibited or stopped because of her sex - sex are going to be unattractive. The definition that gradually become dominant instead is that all groups, decision-making bodies, companies, industries and the like to have as many men as women. Although there are differences between the sexes, resulting in average different preferences. One consequence is that people need to be selected for various positions after the sex they have. The original idea that sex must be unattractive, has been turned into its opposite. The result is great injustice to individuals - such as forced too often both men and women to stand back for a rainy deserving persons for the powers to be satisfied with the gender statistics. Individuals sacrificed on an unjust ideology altar.
I could write much more, but not even a bloggförlängd debate article can be endless. To learn more, order or download "'s Oppression and female domination" here. In the book you can read about female pigs and female domination technique. And much more. These chapters are:
- Man - subordinate sex - More female privileges - Female domination technique - the five methods - The myth of men as work-shy drones - Women are always "hit" - slant in the media - Rigged polls - as you ask will be answered - Men may be violated rough but women not at all - women guarding his territory and preventing men's equality - the matriarchal gender power relations in the children's area - women send innocent men to jail - Female offenders azevias de grao receive more lenient punishment - Women's violence toward men silenced - How some percentage was 20 - on wage differentials - the social construction is a construction - Equality which developed into its opposite - I accuse
This entry was posted on Wednesday, January
Regarding azevias de grao my criticism of feminism on Brännpunkt today: In an article you have to make themselves short. azevias de grao Here on the blog, I develop the idea a little more. Incidentally, the book "Man's Oppression and female domination" can be ordered (150 SEK) or downloaded for free (pdf or mp3) here.
Consider this statement: "According to the traditional gender role pattern, it is women who must stay home with the children, while the men have access to the workplace." Is there anything strange about the claim? Yes, it contains azevias de grao two loaded terms, the negatively charged "must" and the positively charged "have access to". These are interspersed with the statement that men appear to be favored, and women appear to be underutilized.
Taste this alternative formulation: "The traditional gender role pattern, it is women who have access azevias de grao to the children, while the men have to enter working azevias de grao life." Suddenly it is sorry for the men as they are being exploited by the women. Why can not you just as easily see it like?
Because feminism has created a score that favors the self. In fact, women have a great privilege in its traditional position closest to the kids, but it pretends to not care. It is one of many examples of how feminism angled social climate. Many of the women's privilege "does not count".
Feminism also applies the "equality a la carte". It wants to change things in the areas where women are, or considered to be, at a disadvantage. In areas where the men are at a disadvantage however, it might well continue to be as it is. Now maybe conscription will be abolished, but why feminism has for decades been so incredibly quiet about the huge injustice that military service meant for men? And why is it all right for a woman to say to her husband: "Olle, how long will I have to nag at you, when you should clean the drain in the basement?" While it would be horrible and totally unthinkable for a man to say to his wife "Eve, how long will I have to nag at you, when you should wash up after yesterday '?
Another thing I want to address in this extension of Focal Point article is the role of media. Some brilliant exceptions, but in essence, the media have gone into the role of megaphone for feminism. "There is a very, very big fear among leading media companies to go against the feminist currents, and the same goes for the press corps. We have received a subjective journalism in the area. Media has a huge debt for the perverse social climate, "said freelance journalist Annica Frisk. This has led many media in their news reporting actively seek out news that can be presented as different forms of oppression of women, while the positions of the men is not nearly as interesting. This has in turn led to the Swedish people today have an exaggerated view of women's problems and an over exaggerated picture of men's problems. Excellent soil for feminism, then, which of course was the point.
Furthermore, we have received an incorrect definition of the concept of equality. The original, and rightly so, the meaning is that no one should be inhibited or stopped because of her sex - sex are going to be unattractive. The definition that gradually become dominant instead is that all groups, decision-making bodies, companies, industries and the like to have as many men as women. Although there are differences between the sexes, resulting in average different preferences. One consequence is that people need to be selected for various positions after the sex they have. The original idea that sex must be unattractive, has been turned into its opposite. The result is great injustice to individuals - such as forced too often both men and women to stand back for a rainy deserving persons for the powers to be satisfied with the gender statistics. Individuals sacrificed on an unjust ideology altar.
I could write much more, but not even a bloggförlängd debate article can be endless. To learn more, order or download "'s Oppression and female domination" here. In the book you can read about female pigs and female domination technique. And much more. These chapters are:
- Man - subordinate sex - More female privileges - Female domination technique - the five methods - The myth of men as work-shy drones - Women are always "hit" - slant in the media - Rigged polls - as you ask will be answered - Men may be violated rough but women not at all - women guarding his territory and preventing men's equality - the matriarchal gender power relations in the children's area - women send innocent men to jail - Female offenders azevias de grao receive more lenient punishment - Women's violence toward men silenced - How some percentage was 20 - on wage differentials - the social construction is a construction - Equality which developed into its opposite - I accuse
This entry was posted on Wednesday, January
No comments:
Post a Comment